AQSIQ requires Huangming company to submit the cha

AQSIQ requires Huangming company to report the query materials separately. Recently, Jiangsu Institute of quality supervision and inspection (hereinafter referred to as Jiangsu Institute of quality supervision and inspection) explained the response and the Clarification Announcement of sunrise Oriental () did not let Huang Ming give up. Yesterday (October 23), Huang Ming said that on the basis of a query submitted to relevant national ministries and commissions before (October 16), he mailed a real name report to the General Administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine, the Ministry of finance, the national development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of industry and information technology to prove that the inspection report of Jiangsu quality inspection institute was suspected of being forged. Up to now, AQSIQ has contacted Huangming company and started to inquire about relevant information

since then, the daily economy has repeatedly called the Jiangsu Quality Inspection Institute and the Board Secretary of sunrise Oriental to verify whether the two parties' proof of Huang Ming's real name is true. However, as of press time, neither of the above parties has answered

does the inspection site meet the regulatory requirements

on October 18, sunrise Oriental issued a Clarification Announcement, saying that the company had started testing water heater products as early as October 2011, so it could issue hundreds of reports required for subsidies in a relatively short time, and showed some media photos of type inspection reports that were tested in March this year. In order to fundamentally solve the safety problems of the chemical industry, especially hazardous chemical enterprises, Jiangsu quality inspection institute also issued the report on the inspection of solar water heater products

according to the first sunrise Dongfang test report published by the media, the test report numbered (2012) sjzwj-xs0726 issued by Jiangsu Institute of quality supervision and inspection is type test. The test location is Guanghua East Street/sunrise Dongfang solar energy Co., Ltd., and the test basis is gb/t

in this regard, the technical director of Huangming described the experimental curve. Zhanglifeng said that this test report revealed that the test site did not meet the regulatory requirements at all. According to the regulations of China National Accreditation Service for conformity assessment (CNAs), only testing at the registered place can be recognized

according to the CNAs station, Jiangsu quality inspection institute has registered 6 effective testing addresses, which are: No. 5, Guanghua East Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province; No. 18, Tianmu Road, Tianmu Lake Industrial Park, Liyang City; No. 500, Luyuan Road, Xinjie street, Yixing City; Jinyuan Road, Anyi Industrial Park, Baoying County; Dashishanxian waste treatment plant, Licheng Town, Liyang City (next to national highway 104); Xuzhou new urban area industrial park. Sunrise Oriental registered a valid detection address, namely Haining industry and Trade Park, Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province

zhanglifeng believes that sunrise Oriental is located in Haining industry and Trade Park, Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province, more than 300 kilometers away from No. 5, Guanghua East Street, Nanjing. The same sample was tested and completed within 4 days. It is impossible to test how the product can be converted into space and successfully complete all the type inspection items

zhanglifeng pointed out that unless Jiangsu quality inspection institute outsources the inspection business to sunrise Oriental or leases sunrise Oriental's testing equipment for inspection, that is, the report made by sunrise Oriental products in sunrise Oriental. Is this still a third-party testing report? This is not allowed in the application documents of the people benefiting project

it is clearly stipulated in the application document of the people benefiting project that the type inspection report and the energy efficiency inspection report must be issued by a third-party inspection agency

Huang Ming proved that the inspection time did not meet the standard

the test report of sunrise Oriental also showed that the arrival date of the sample was march18,2012, and the inspection date was march25,2012 ~ march28,2012. Huang Ming also provided evidence for this

according to clause 9.3.4 of gb/t, type inspection is the inspection of all items. In addition to the inapplicable test items described in the remarks of the inspection report, the sample also needs to be tested for appearance, hot water storage tank, pressure resistance, thermal performance, water quality, electrical safety, air exposure, external thermal shock, rain, backflow prevention, frost resistance, impact resistance, support stiffness and strength, etc

zhanglifeng said that the type inspection required 1 day for thermal performance, 2 days for water quality and 2 days for air drying, totaling 5 days. This does not include such items as its frost resistance for 20 hours, measurement of contour daylighting area, and weighing of water capacity of hot water storage tank

previously, many experts from testing institutions interviewed said: on the premise that the weather conditions continue to meet the test requirements, a complete type inspection will take about a week between China's conventional extruders and production lines.

Huang Ming believes that the report issued by sunrise Oriental is clearly a type inspection report. A formal type inspection report was issued within 4 days, which did not meet the time cycle requirements of the national standard (gb/t) and was obviously suspected of illegal fraud

in addition, Jiangsu quality inspection institute once said in the report on the inspection of solar water heater products that it had issued 379 energy efficiency inspection reports and type inspection reports. In this regard, Huang Ming believes that it is impossible to complete such a large amount of testing with the testing scale and capacity of Jiangsu quality supervision and inspection research

it is understood that Huang Ming has mailed the above evidence to the AQSIQ, the Ministry of finance, the national development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of industry and information technology. According to a person from Huangming company, yesterday, the AQSIQ called Huangming company and asked it to resubmit the questioning materials on October 16 by submitting them to the AQSIQ separately. The Ministry of finance, the national development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of industry and information technology also said that they had received the first questioning materials submitted by Huang Ming on October 16

since then, the daily economy has repeatedly called Jiangsu Quality Inspection Institute and the Board Secretary of sunrise Oriental to verify whether Huang Ming's real name proof is true. However, as of press time, neither of the above parties has answered. Therefore, the above-mentioned evidence provided by Huang Ming has not been confirmed. (daily economy)